Bay Blog - Chesapeake Bay Program

The Chesapeake Bay Program's blog

Recent posts

Categories

Archive

Currently Reading

Tag Cloud

Flickr Photos

A Little Goes a Long Way

Posted: May 13 2009, 10:54 by Karey Harris

Last week, a family friend who teaches at a local middle school invited me to her classroom.  She wanted someone to teach her sixth graders about sediments, nutrients, and the Bay.  I agreed, and took Krystal, one of my co-workers, along.  We had an amazing day.  All in all, I think we talked to about 300 incredibly smart 6th graders!  They knew that sediment clouds the water and covers any organisms on the bottom, that the watershed is made up of six states (naming them was more challenging), and that oysters used to be able to filter the entire volume of the Bay in three days.  (It now takes almost a year!)  The kids had a great background of information, so we added to it a little bit.

We’ve all heard that nutrients in the Bay are harmful and cause algal blooms and dead zones.  The best question of the day, however, came from a student who asked, “If plants need nutrients to grow, why aren’t the bay grasses growing a lot and providing oxygen for the animals at the bottom?”  I had been waiting for someone to ask that!  He was right, the plants have all the nutrients that they could ever want; the problem is that the plants don’t get enough light.  Algae float near the surface, soak up sunlight and nutrients, and form a layer over the water’s surface.  That layer, (plus the murkiness due to sediment), blocks sunlight.  Not enough reaches the bottom to let the grasses grow.  As the plants and older generations of algae die, they sink to the bottom and decompose.  Decomposers use oxygen.  Without plants to provide oxygen, whatever was left in the water is sucked out by decomposers, leaving an anoxic or “dead” zone every summer.

Krystal and I had a wrap-up discussion with the students, where we all listed things we could do to help the Bay. They knew the basics, like recycling and car-pooling, and that every little bit helps.  They were excited to hear other opportunities, though.  Some students live on waterfront property, and were eager to go home and ask their parents if they could grow oyster spat for a year.  Some have yards that are fertilized twice a year, and were concerned when it was suggested that they skip the spring treatments and wait until fall.  Several students even asked if there was someplace they could volunteer.

Krystal and I left that day feeling like we’d made a small impact, but apparently we did more than we thought.  The next day, I was handed a hundred or so thank-you letters from the students.  Most were the typical “thanks for coming,” but several got me really excited!  One said that they went home and told their dad not to fertilize this year.  Another said that she’ll make sure her parents clean up after the family dog.  A third got permission from her parents to raise oysters and wanted more information.  All of this reaction came out of a 30-minute talk!  The kids were so eager to help, once they saw the real problem.  It didn’t take much; an explanation of what’s happening, a picture of the Bay from last summer, and some easy tips to help out.  All they needed was to know what they can do.

I sincerely hope they continue their enthusiasm through adulthood, and I hope it’s as contagious for everyone else as it was for Krystal and me!

Biodiversity conference links Bay and global habitat issues

Posted: Dec 15 2008, 16:58 by Karey Harris

Karey Harris is the toxics subcommittee staffer with the Chesapeake Research Consortium at the Chesapeake Bay Program office.

Imagine seeing a video of a frog in the Amazon that was believed to be extinct until she was caught on this tape.  You see her, abdomen full of eggs, struggle to get to water to lay her eggs.  What a find! How exciting for that scientist behind the camera!  Then you are told that she was ill, died soon after the video was taken, and no other frogs of her species have been found since.  She is currently in a jar in the Smithsonian.  Just an instant after you expect to hear a success story, you realize that you have just watched a species go extinct from the planet.  That happened to me last week, and this little frog tugged at my heart like no amphibian before.

I had the pleasure of attending the 9th National Conference on Science, Policy, and the Environment held by the National Council for Science and the Environment (NCSE) at the Reagan Building in Washington, D.C. on December 8-10.  This year’s conference topic was “Biodiversity in a Rapidly Changing World,” during which, among other activities, I watched the frog go extinct.

So why tell the sad story?  As species go extinct worldwide, we are losing biodiversity as well.  Biodiversity is lengthily defined as “the variability among living organisms from all sources … and the ecological complexes of which they are a part; this includes diversity within species, between species, and of ecosystems.” Without all the words, a place that has good biodiversity has many different species all living in a small area.  A coral reef is probably the most vivid example, with its multitudes of coral, anemones, and fish.  An environment with very little biodiversity may be as bleak as a cornfield, all dominated by the same species with a few others thrown in.  Biodiversity is often used as a measure of ecosystem health.  As biodiversity decreases, the ecosystem’s health and stability decreases as well.

(Check out an example of good biodiversity from MarineBio, versus an example of bad biodiversity from Holistic Management.)

The three-day conference focused on ways to preserve biodiversity worldwide.  Topics covered policy and legislation, scientific research gaps, and communication to the public.  Speakers who made their case for making changes and saving biodiversity included the director of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History and a Pulitzer Prize-winning author!  Each day after the speakers, various breakout sessions were offered to give each participant an individual experience.  I could write pages on what I learned in those discussions, and I have a stack of literature on my desk that I still need to read!

In addition to new things, I heard several familiar themes: less pollution, more preserved land, better land use, teach the public how to be more environmentally responsible, and so on. Some of these are ideas we focus on here at the Bay Program.  Since this conference had a global focus, we must not be so far off base in our ideas of how to save our Bay.  I hope that one day the world, and the Bay, will resemble the thriving systems they once were, in part because this conference had something good to say.